I must confess that the Brits excel in the spectacle and ceremonial aspects.
Over the course of sixty years, the Queen has truly done an outstanding job. Here in our idyllic nation, we have taken pride in witnessing the celebrations. It’s unfortunate about the rain and chilly weather during what should be joyful June in the UK.
Phil has opted to stay in bed, watching the event unfold on television, while the Monarch persevered.
After observing the opulent and noble procession, should we consider becoming a republic?
It is claimed that the Queen justifies her role by attracting thousands of tourists to the UK. What do you estimate the cost to be for the average Brit over these past four days? Who truly benefited financially from the influx of visitors? Is it Polly in Paisley, Bertie in Birmingham, or Larry in London?
Dukes and Earls in the church, Lords and Ladies enjoying their tea. The historical Thames appeared desolate without its docks and dockworkers. Barges that should have been laden with coal for the power stations instead carried cold and soggy tourists.
The Royals can certainly put on a production to demonstrate to the world the magnificence and history of Britain, and they do so better than any other nation could.
I felt a genuine sense of pride for the old mother country. Yet, did it convince me that a monarchy is superior to a republic? Will visitors to Australia enrich me, or simply the shopkeepers?
Could I manage to support all the near-Royal hangers-on who seem to travel in first class, reside in the finest hotels, and maintain an entourage of ladies-in-waiting, chefs, butlers, dressers, and friends?
If only we could have the Queen to ourselves and eliminate the elite and privileged; I would wholeheartedly support that. The Queen is invaluable. She performs her duties well, demonstrating dedication and professionalism.
A Royal republic with the Queen, along with Kylie and Rolf.
I would cast my vote for that any day.
by TOG